Home | News | Us  

August 31, 2014 – 8:19 pm | Views: 302

(Reuters) – President Barack Obama faced criticism over his foreign policy from both Democratic and Republican lawmakers on Sunday as he wrestled with crises in Iraq, Syria, Libya and Ukraine.

U.S. President Obama departs the White House Press Briefing Room after addressing reporters in Washington

President Barack Obama departs the White House Press Briefing Room after addressing reporters in Washington, August 28, 2014. REUTERS/Larry Downing

Republican lawmakers seized on Obama’s comment on Thursday when he said, We don’t have a strategy yet for confronting the Islamic State militant group, saying it suggested indecisiveness.

On Sunday, influential Democrats chimed in with their own critiques of Obama’s foreign policy, chiding him for being too cautious on Syria, and urging him to do more to help Ukraine resist Russian advances.

I’ve learned one thing about this president, and that is he’s very cautious. Maybe, in this instance, too cautious, Democrat Dianne Feinstein, chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, told NBC’s Meet the Press program on Sunday when asked about Obama’s comments about dealing with Islamic State militants.

Representative Adam Smith, the top Democrat on the House Armed Services Committee, cautioned that any U.S. action in Syria had to be carefully calibrated to avoid inadvertently supporting the regime of Bashar al-Assad.

But he joined Republicans in urging Obama to provide more than just non-lethal aid to the Ukrainian government as it resisted Russian forces.

We should be more forceful when supporting the Ukrainian government, Smith told CBS’s Face the Nation program. I think it’s appropriate to up that aid to make them a more capable fighting force, to resist this incursion.

The critical comments came as the Obama administration faced myriad crises around the world, including a reported attack on an annex to the U.S. embassy in Tripoli, Libya. [ID:nL1N0R10F5]

In response to the criticism of Obama’s comment on the lack of a strategy, White House officials said it reflected the fact that the Pentagon was still developing options for possible military action in Syria.

U.S. officials emphasized that the administration does have a broader strategy, and the military plan is only one element.

The lawmakers statements reflect growing concern about potential homeland security threats posed by hundreds of U.S., British and Canadian citizens who have trained to fight in Syria.

But Obama may still have trouble winning support from a deeply divided Congress for expanded military action against the Islamic State.

His foreign policy is in absolute freefall, said Representative Mike Rogers, who heads the House Intelligence Committee. This ‘don’t do stupid stuff’ policy isn’t working,

Republican Senator John McCain said U.S. action against Islamic State would require more U.S. special operations forces, more air controllers; more advisers to train the Iraqi military, which was near collapse; and other countries to partner with.

But McCain said Obama was having trouble building a coalition to take action against Islamic State militants after backing away from strikes against Syria last year.

These people … are very cynical, particularly the Saudis and others, because we said we were going to strike Syria, and then the president reversed himself without even telling them.

(Additional reporting by Michael Flaherty; Editing by Sandra Maler)

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
The following two tabs change content below.

Article from: reuters.com


© 2020 Yoopya · Subscribe: RSS Twitter · Yoopya.com designed by Yoopya Int

Support us!

If you like this site please help and make click on any of these buttons!

Obama faces bipartisan criticism over his foreign policy

Wildcard SSL